This essay brings to an
the debate between those who believe that the message according to the
gospel can be reconciled with science, and those who believe that
and the gospel are contradictory. Any debate implies uncertainty, when
a debate therefore comes to an end, so does the uncertainty that
the debate. Modern science and the message according to the gospel are
Henceforth I will refer to deluded
man as natural man, and to transformed man, as spiritual
MESSAGE ACCORDING TO THE
The message according to
the gospel is clear. Unless natural man is born again, unless his
rationality is restored, he remains deluded. Spiritual man is natural
man resurrected. Man comes
into this world with an intact mind, the new born baby is a spiritual
Soon after birth the infant dies spiritually, his mind is deluded,
he falls from grace and becomes a natural person. Unless he is
he will remain spiritually dead.
according to the gospel.
The transition from
natural man to spiritual man is referred to as transformation or
conversion. Transformation is the restoration of reason to the
irrational mindset. The process of transformation has two elements;
confession and restoration. The minute natural man confesses in faith
that he is deluded, the door is opened for transformation. It is
important to know that confession and faith go hand in hand. Natural
cannot know that he is deluded, that he lives in a fantasy world, if he
knew, it would mean that he is not deluded. Restoration is a very
painful in the
sense that unless we die to our fantasy world, it is not possible for
to be "born again", to become spiritual beings. Confession therefore
to conversion, the restoration of reason.
come about the easy way,
through faith, or the difficult way, out of desperation. It seems that
most transformations take place in desperation. The individual is down
and out, in the gutter, only then does he "give up", and acknowledges
that his whole life is a
sham. On the other hand if a person accepts in faith that his mind is
corrupted, it opens the door, without him having to go through all the
suffering that brings him to the gutter. The main stumbling block for
natural man is pride, most individuals are too prideful to accept in
faith that they are deluded.
WORLD WE LIVE IN.
present world we live in is a product of natural man, irrational man.
It means that all the so called knowledge that we have gathered from
the beginning of 'civilization', is falsified information. This means
that our present world, is a pseudo
world, removed from the real world. This is the reason why the world is
such a mess. Everything that is wrong with this present world is a
of natural man. The house we have built has no foundation, it is
on sand, it is now collapsing, whether we believe it or not.
THE END OF SECRECY.
have now reached a point in time
where it has become necessary to re-publish information which has been
withdrawn and ignored in the past. Information that has been censored
natural man. Publications such as: Herbert Dingle's, "Science at the
crossroads"; Morris Kline's, "Mathematics: The loss of certainty";
George Berkley's "The
analyst"; George Orwell's novel, "1984"; Ayan Rand's novel, "Atlas
to mention only a few. We have reached the end of a crooked line, there
be no more secrecy about matters that affect each and every individual
earth. Reality is not debatable. Natural man is at
had his day, his time is up.
WORLD HAS SURVIVED
is difficult to imagine the extent of the damage done by natural
man. We will examine the process of falsification, however before we do
that, we need to see
why the bogus information system has survived for so long. Because
man is deluded, the world as he knows it is an extension of himself.
man's identity is reflected in his world. By protecting his imaginary
he protects his false identity. The two systems that has worked
to maintain the bogus world system, is education, and mass
Education is the process whereby the delusion is reinforced during the
formal years, and mass
communication is the process by which the delusion is maintained in
advent of the internet, ushered
in the the demise of the dissemination of false information. The
information highway has brought an end to censorship. Censorship is the
process which prevents wisdom from reaching the masses. The personal
computer together with the internet have opened the floodgates of
For the first time in the history of mankind, freedom of information is
a reality. Not so long ago this message would have been prevented from
your eyes. No longer is it possible for natural man to protect his
identity, the information highway has opened the door for the
dissemination of the truth.
BIRTH OF THE NEW DISPENSATION
end of secrecy has opened the door that will bring about the
collective transformation of the corrupt world system. The coming new
is going to differ radically from what we have today. Everything is
to be made new. The rational mindset, is going to replace the
mindset, as the dominant mindset. Spiritual man is going to bring about
the healing of the nations, a total transformation of the world system.
Unfortunately it seems that we will have to go through a major world
to bring about the change, natural man will resist change with all the
that he has at his disposal.
falsification of reality is an
on going process that dates back to the beginning of history. Through
the ages a small number of spiritual individuals attempted to expose
the superficial system, however at the time, it was all in vain.
Natural man was able to
suppress all information that threatened the system. It is important to
know that there is no need for natural man to conspire(organize)
change. Natural man acts in his own self interest when he defends the
He is protecting his own identity. Natural man cannot separate himself
that which he has fabricated. By protecting the system he is protecting
PROCESS OF FALSIFICATION
will now examine a
number of instances of falsification, so that we can clearly see how
natural man has fabricated his own imaginary world. Science is the
process whereby man studies his environment and systematically explains
that which he observes. Because natural man is deluded, it follows that
the results of his scientific endeavors will have to be at variance
with reality. In other words his
explanations (theories) are false. These falsehoods are reinforced by
education system, maintained by the media, and protected by natural
What we have is a viscous circle that is perpetuated from generation to
time to time a spiritual man makes his mark on history. One such a
person was Pythagoras of Samos (582-500 BC). Pythagoras believed that
universe is structured in an orderly manner and that it is possible for
to comprehend the nature of things. He believed that there is a
explanation for everything, and that there is no place for
in a harmonious world. "Pythagoras, however, is generally credited with
theory of the functional significance of numbers in the objective
and in music"(EB).
none of Pythagoras'
original writings survived. " It is difficult to distinguish
Pythagoras' teachings from those of his disciples. None of his writings
has survived, and Pythagoreans invariably supported their doctrines by
indiscriminately citing their master's authority "(EB). Had Pythagoras
been alive today he would scoff at those who proclaim the existence of
irrationals by using the idea of incommensurability
as an excuse. The idea of incommensurability is a myth dating back to
Hippasus (450 BC). To this day the idea of incommensurability is still
by natural man as a reality.
MYTH OF INCOMMENSURABILITY
idea that when using a ruler (measuring stick), there will be certain
extensions within the scope of the ruler, which will not be measurable.
given for this is that certain extensions will fall in between the
on the ruler, ie. there are gaps(holes) along the extension. This is a
classical example of natural man's delusion. Because natural man's
reality is distorted he 'measures' by focusing on non-extension (the
on the ruler) instead of using the extension of the ruler as a standard.
THE STANDARD OF MEASUREMENT
In reality the
measurement is extension, the means by which we measure
is the ruler.
The accuracy of measurement will be dependent on the number of
divisions on the ruler. The more divisions there are the more
precise(accurate) will the measurement be. Using a ruler with a three
hundred millimeter division, it is possible to measure any
extension between one and three hundred millimeters, within an accuracy
of one millimeter. There is no
between one and three
hundred millimeters that is incommensurable with the given ruler.
of the first
historical figures to demonstrate that there is something amiss with
natural man mental process, was Zeno of Elea (495-430 BC). Zeno was a
student of Parmenides. Parmenides rejected the idea of
plurality(duality) and believed that "all is one". Zeno proposed four
different paradoxes in defense of his master. Zeno's second paradox is
known as " Archilles and the Tortoise ". This
paradox clearly shows how the deluded mind of natural man works.
AND THE TORTOISE
paradox is stated as
follows: A race is run with two contenders, achilles the hare, and the
The tortoise is given a head start in order to level the playing field.
race is started and in the time it takes the hare to get to the
where the tortoise was at the start, the tortoise would have moved
some distance. This is repeated, and the outcome is that the hare
catch the tortoise. We know that the hare will pass the tortoise and
we know that there is an error in the basic premise, and consequently
the subsequent reasoning.
man looks at the above
statement and comes to the following conclusion: " But the baffling
thing is, although it is contradicted by the commonest actions in
everybody's life, Zeno's
point is logically unassailable. There is no technical flaw in his
The truth is that there is a complete lack of logic in
statement, and because the statement is based on a false premise, it
to lead to a false conclusion. According to natural man, the problem
only be resolved by the use of the calculus. (ie. a false premise
The mind of natural man nullifies
the head start and
consequently introduces a false premise. The false premise is this :
'in the time it
takes the hare to get to the position where the tortoise was at the
of the race.... '. The hare is already at the position where the
was before the head start was given. We cannot just
the head start from the equation and expect to solve the problem. The
that the race starts, the hare begins to deplete the head start. Soon
the head start is depleted the hare will pass the tortoise. The final
will be determined by the length of the track, the head start, and the
respective velocities of the hare and the tortoise.
THEN AND NOW
Zeno ? The system of then, is no different than the system of now. The
has not changed, and consequently the blunders continue. There has been
great technological progress in the last century, and yet the
underlying theories are false. Natural man has visited the moon, and to
top it off, man launched an out of focus telescope into earth orbit.
What is the connection between landing a man on the moon, and
constructing an out of focus telescope ?
The connection is this; on landing a man on the moon, the scientists
on a error correcting feedback system to reach their destination, and
building the telescope, man relied on science, without incorporating an
error correcting feedback system, to shape the telescope lens.
the lens was flawed.
will now go back a hundred years and examine some major blunders in
the field of science. The first blunder came at the turn of the
previous century, the introduction of the special and general theories
of relativity. This
was soon to be followed by the theory of the so-called 'quantum
and more recently the fallacy of the so-called 'big bang', the
rationalization for the origin of the universe. Natural man cannot
learn from his mistakes, he can only repeat them. Until such time as
natural man's reason is restored, he will continue fabricating false
theories, to correct his false premises.
In his book
RELATIVITY: The special and general theory ", Einstein takes an example
of a man dropping a stone from a moving train. Two people observe the
event, one person observes the event from the embankment, and the other
person, the one who drops the stone, from the carriage. Now according
to Einstein, and I quote him word for word:
'The stone traverses a
to a system of co-ordinates rigidly attached to the carriage, but
to a system of co-ordinates attached to the ground (embankment) it
describes a parabola. With the aid of this example it is clearly seen
that there is no such thing as an independently existing trajectory
") but only a trajectory relative to a particular body of reference.'
reality is that both observers are in
world, and that both observers will plot the same path for the falling
The stone follows an independent existing trajectory, describing a
regardless of the particular body of reference. This is what happens in
the real world, and what happens in the real world, is what real
is all about.
Einstein's distorted perception of reality, he comes to the
that the same stone can follow two paths. In order for his observation
conform with reality, he had no choice but to formulate a false theory
correct his false premise. Einstein commits the unpardonable sin of
the 'moving earth'. According to him the movement of the stone is
to the stationary earth and moving train, or, to the stationary
train and moving earth. This seems strange, however, even if we accept
this premise, why does he then disregard the 'moving' earth when the
carriage is the frame of reference? Surely if the man on the embankment
plots the path of the
stone on his co-ordinate system, the path will be the same path that
man in the carriage plots on his co-ordinate system. When the man in
carriage let's go of the stone, the stone is earth bound and it 'moves'
to the earth, independent of the carriage.
theory of relativity leads to all kinds of irrational
conclusions. In his book "Science at the Crossroad's" Herbert Dingle
outlined the impossibility of two clocks, both running slower than each
other. One of the many false conclusions derived from the special
theory of relativity.
second major blunder that
followed the fabrication of special relativity is the idea of quantum
There can be no better example than quantum mechanics to illustrate the
irrationality of natural man. The idea that gave birth to quantum
is the so-called twin slit experiment. There is no need to go into the
of the experiment, all we need to do to expose the chaos, is to examine
the components which make up the experiment, and the resulting
The duality of the natural mindset is clearly seen in this
experiment consists of the
following: a source; a particle and a non-particle(wave), a
restriction; a barrier
and a non-barrier(slit in the barrier), an observer and a
non-observer(somebody that is not looking i.e. a ghost) The conclusions
drawn from this 'experiment' is that chaos prevails, which should not
be surprising, the duality is clear. Supposedly the two-slit experiment
shows that at the sub atomic level, the
rules of nature (cause and effect) is replaced by randomness(non cause
effect). The innocent reader may see this as a joke, i can assure him
is modern science.
THE HARVEST IS RIPE
so a debate comes to an abrupt end. The harvest is ripe, the time
has come for the curse to be removed. The Kingdom of God is
established. This world is judged, the time has come for reason to be
restored. Natural man has had his day, his house is built on sand, and
now it is crumbling. Nobody can stop the looming disaster. Soon it will
be the dawning of a new day,
a new beginning, the end to all the misery and suffering on earth.
also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the
hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow
the hiding place."
Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane
and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called. "